The Elitists and Their Aliens

Anther good article from the Daily Bell. Here is the link to the original E. :

VIDEO: Power Tools of Ancient Builders 12,000 Years Ago

Thursday, February 23, 2012 – by Staff Report

Might the tools and technology of ancient builders have come from distant galaxies? Evidence suggests that an ancient mountaintop fortress in Peru was constructed with laser-like tools… temples at Vijayanagara India were built to harness cosmic energy… and an acoustic chamber in Malta enabled interplanetary communication. If the ancient builders did use advanced technology, could it prove that aliens visited Earth thousands of years ago? – YouTube, from History Channel program

Dominant Social Theme: The aliens did it.

Free-Market Analysis: We keep running into videos of ancient cities built from 50-ton blocks of fused, smooth granite. In this video, we learn that at least one Peruvian fortress is built on such ruins and may be 12,000 years old instead of 700 years old. Wow.

This video (description excerpted above) seems to show clearly once again that the ancients (or very ancients) had power tools and used them to construct their cities.

This should not be so controversial as it seems. There are many evidences (mostly unreported) of power-tools marks on ancient constructions in Egypt. It is increasingly clear that the Egyptians used some sort of artificial light as well, to illuminate the gloom of their many tombs.

Recently, a video report was featured on several widely read ‘Net aggregators showing clearly power-tool marks on stone, just as in Egypt. These reports – and their presentation on YouTube – are fascinating.

What’s discouraging, however, is the almost inevitable accompaniment these days by speculations that this is “alien” technology. The description (above) of the video on ancient power tools (featured below), immediately focuses on “distant galaxies.” Thanks, History Channel.

We figure this is a kind of dominant social theme of the power elite that apparently wants to run the world. As we’ve pointed out in the past, the powers-that-be have a lot invested in making sure that people do not believe that there were ancient cultures that were as good if not better technologically than modern ones.

The elites want one-world government; in order to move forward with this project it must seem inevitable. That’s why the idea that advanced civilizations existed in the past does not get much attention – and in fact seems to be under-reported to say the least.

But thanks to what we call the Internet Reformation, the reports keep coming. Many of the anomalies inherent in the construction of ancient monuments and cities are showing up on the Internet, often in short videos.

The elites, of course, have apparently come up with an answer. (Don’t they always?) As these high-tech anomalies exist but cannot be explained, a virtual extraterrestrial industry has been created. There are seemingly endless numbers of experts willing to comment in books, articles and on TV and radio about the possibility that ETs handed certain technology to ancient humans.

One of the reasons we enjoy investigator Graham Hancock’s speculations about ancient times is because he often comes up with speculative theories focusing on human beings and their putative social and technological interactions rather than alien occurances. In fact, from what we can tell, he believes that there was an ancient human civilization between 10,000 and 20,000 years old that was basically a seafaring one.

When glaciers melted, the cities of this ancient civilization were submerged. Hancock spent a lot of time trying to find evidences of such civilizations and it was he who helped publicize the discovery of the ancient submerged city of Dwarka, off the Indian cost.

This is a monumental discovery. Dwarka is the city from which the revered Hindu God Krishna came. It is probably the single most important find since the ancient city of Troy. Yet the announcement of its existence several years ago and follow-up reports have been strangely muted.

The powers-that-be really don’t want a lot of speculation about ancient technologies. They want people to believe that current society is the apex of human civilization. When existence surfaces of anomalous building technologies, they are to be explained by alien interference and support.

Now, it could be that ancient aliens DID visit earth and have a hand in the marvelous and inexplicable structures that still dot the planet. But we find these explanations usually get a lot more exposure than (slightly) more mundane theses that have been suggested by someone like Hancock.

It is only fair to point out that as he ages, Hancock has grown ever-more radical in terms of theoretical underpinnings. But still, we find this alien meme to be just one more weary theme among many … It’s wrong to affirm the genius of the ancients because to do so would bring up too many questions about the modern day. People might start to compare societies and decide this wasn’t the best of all possible worlds after all.

Decide for yourself. Here’s the video.

(Video from AusAries2’s YouTube user channel.)





2 responses to “The Elitists and Their Aliens

  • Larry Who

    In the Bible, world bankers (or international bankers) are called money changers. So, when you mention that world bankers fund both sides of wars and unrest in a nation, you really are talking about currency speculation, and not so much about loans.

    If Russia wanted to back civil unrest in America, they would not do it by spending rubles for ads in newspapers. They would then exchange the rubles for dollars so they can buy advertising or back foment in whatever way they can.

    Therefore, by saying that world bankers fund both sides of wars, what is really meant is that money changers (or currency speculators) make money by exchanging one currency for another so a nation can trade goods with other nations. The profits the world bankers make is between the bid and ask price for a currency which is called the spread. A stable currency has a small spread while an unstable one has a big spread.

    Okay, that’s what I understand about world bankers, but what other system would work? This one has been in affect for thousands of years and probably won’t be changed anytime soon.

    Now, your thoughts on conversation between both parties in the civil unrest which is going on are valid points, but how will that be accomplished? It won’t…not until people’s spiritual eyes are opened.

    The rest of your points I figure are personal concerns you have with capitalism or America.

    As usual, I enjoy your discussions.

    • ephraiyim

      Actually it is a bit more insidious than just exchanging currency Larry. They are running they show. They control the currency. The FED for instance lends money to the thousands of US banks a interest which is then vouched by the US treasury through various financial instruments. The problem is they depend on you to pay it.
      In any case no nation owns its own money any longer with some rare exceptions that is what the IMF and World Monetary Bank are all about. They own it all. and of course, their shareholders which are a few hundred select individual families.
      These folks lent money to Adolf Hitler to build hi factories prior to and during WWII while at the same time lending money to the Brits and the US. once we got involved, remember we were in a depression. No one in the world had the money except the folks who had planned the depression WWII. They had also planned and executed the WWI as well as several previous wars that led up to it.
      They set in motion nearly all conflicts that have occurred around the world since at least the War of 1812. Their plan of course is a one world government with their false messiah as the head.
      BTW it is not capitalism that I have a problem with at all. I firmly believe in capitalism and am a strong Anarcho-Capitalist. Unfortunately we have not had a truly Capitalist system since the Civil War when Corporatism which is where corporations are allowed special governmental considerations over other entrepreneurs thus creating unfair and limited competitive structures that prevents a level playing field for all.
      Government should not be involved in markets at all. I would encourage you to look into Austrian Economics and see how true economic systems and capitalism was intended to be and then realize why I oppose what we currently have.
      A couple of sites that might interest you:
      The Daily Bell:
      Mises Institute:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: