The Secret Behind Ted Turner’s Call For A Global One Child Policy

Paul Joseph Watson
December 6, 2010

The Secret Behind Ted Turners Call For A Global One Child Policy 061210top2

Just months after a leaked UN blueprint that revealed climate change alarmists would start pushing “overpopulation” fears in favor of the discredited mantra of global warming as a means of dismantling the middle class, billionaire globalist Ted Turner followed suit during a Cancun luncheon yesterday when he urged the world to adopt China’s brutal one-child policy, and even suggested poor people should be sterilized in return for government handouts.

Following a speech by economist Brian O’Neill from the U.S.’s National Center for Atmospheric Research which “concluded that a rapidly rising global population is contributing to an acceleration of emission growth,” Uncle Ted stepped in to remind us that mere slaves should not aspire to follow his example of having five children, restricting themselves to one or being made to face the wrath of a Chinese-style one child policy, which sends women who defy its edicts to “re-education camps,” once they have been beaten, forcibly injected and had their baby boiled alive inside their womb of course.

“Mr. Turner – a long-time advocate of population control – said the environmental stress on the Earth requires radical solutions, suggesting countries should follow China’s lead in instituting a one-child policy to reduce global population over time. He added that fertility rights could be sold so that poor people could profit from their decision not to reproduce,” reports the Globe and Mail.

The secret behind Turner’s call for western nations to enforce a tyrannical policy that in China is administered by undercover police and “family planning” authorities who kidnap, force drug and then forcibly abort babies of pregnant women, has nothing whatsoever to do with his concern for the environment.

Turner himself has five children and owns no less than 2 million acres of land. He is the largest private landowner on the planet, falling short of only the royal families of Europe. Turner has publicly advocated shocking population reduction programs that would cull the human population by a staggering 95%, a figure only achievable by outright genocide, mass abortion and infanticide.

In the third world, Turner has contributed literally billions to population reduction, namely through United Nations programs, leading the way for the likes of Bill & Melinda Gates and Warren Buffet (Gates’ father has long been a leading board member of Planned Parenthood and a top eugenicist). Gates himself has given speeches in which he promotes the use of vaccines and abortion as a means of reducing global population and lowering CO2 emissions.

Quite how an improvement in health care through vaccines that supposedly save lives would lead to a lowering in global population is an oxymoron, unless Gates was referring to vaccines that sterilize people, which is precisely the same method advocated in White House science advisor John P. Holdren’s 1977 textbook Ecoscience, which calls for a dictatorial “planetary regime” to enforce draconian measures of population reduction via all manner of oppressive techniques, including sterilization.

This is what Gates and Turner discussed when they met in secret with the likes of George Soros and David Rockefeller at a private gathering of billionaires in Manhattan last year, a confab focused around how these globalists could use their wealth to “slow the growth of the world’s population.”

As is manifestly provable, the true agenda behind fanning the flames of fears about overpopulation is to reduce living standards globally, by preventing the third world from ever becoming economically prosperous, while also eviscerating the middle classes of western nations. It has nothing whatsoever to do with saving the earth and is merely another convenient trojan horse that globalists invoke to advance their tyranny.

This fact was admitted in a leaked UN blueprint which emerged in September. The document called for alarmists to push “overpopulation” as a replacement for “climate change,” while conceding that the ultimate goal was to “limit and redirect the aspirations for a better life of rising middle classes around the world,” in other words, to convince the masses that they will have to be content with a state of near poverty in order to save the planet from armageddon. Although Uncle Ted will get to keep his 2 million acres and his five kids will go on to procreate ad infinitum, naturally.

Overpopulation is a myth. The UN’s own figures clearly indicate that population is set to stabilize in 2020 and then drop dramatically after 2050. As the Economist reported, “Fertility is falling and families are shrinking in places— such as Brazil, Indonesia, and even parts of India—that people think of as teeming with children. As our briefing shows, the fertility rate of half the world is now 2.1 or less—the magic number that is consistent with a stable population and is usually called “the replacement rate of fertility”. Sometime between 2020 and 2050 the world’s fertility rate will fall below the global replacement rate.”

To emphasize, not only do the numbers clearly indicate that overpopulation is a contrived scare, but the scaremongers themselves have been caught admitting that they are fanning the fears in order to reduce living standards in the west and consequently set in motion a “global redistribution of wealth.”

And don’t for a second be fooled into thinking that this so-called “global redistribution of wealth” will manifest some kind of socialist utopia. As was uncovered during the Copenhagen summit, the program of “global redistribution of wealth” largely centers around looting the wealth of the middle classes in richer countries through carbon taxes and then using that money to bankroll the construction of world government. As the leaked “Danish text” revealed, the money generated from consumption taxes will go directly to the World Bank, not to developing countries.

Let me emphasize again, even if you believe the claptrap circulated about overpopulation, the men being empowered to “solve the problem” have stated that their primary goal is to kill 95 per cent of humanity while destroying prosperity and economic freedom in the west, as well as ensuring that the third world remains in mountains of debt to the World Bank and IMF.

This is akin to hiring Ted Bundy to spearhead a program aimed at alleviating an epidemic of physical abuse towards women. It would be like appointing Charlie Manson the leader of a teen summer camp.

Ted Turner is a billionaire industrialist with five kids, 2 million acres of land and a network of business interests that combined must spew more carbon dioxide in a year than all the people reading this article put together in a lifetime could manage. And he is telling you to make sacrifices, to not have children, to sell your reproductive rights and be sterilized, to reduce your living standards, just like Al Gores flaps his gums about rising sea levels caused by global warming while purchasing oceanside property worth millions of dollars.

How much more evidence will it take for people to accept the fact that overpopulation is a myth and that it has been hijacked by global warming alarmists who are now using it as a replacement for the discredited science of man-made climate change in order to build their new world order, which is based entirely around squeezing the middle class and making people more dependent on big government, thereby becoming the architects of their own enslavement and being forced to crawl cap-in-hand to the likes of Uncle Ted and beg for a dime.

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show. Watson has been interviewed by many publications and radio shows, including Vanity Fair and Coast to Coast AM, America’s most listened to late night talk show.


2 responses to “The Secret Behind Ted Turner’s Call For A Global One Child Policy

  • Victoria Wallace

    We must control the population of this earth and although I don’t agree with the one child idea I do think limiting all people to a total of two children until we reduce the earth’s population is the right thing to do. In the last fifty years the population has grown from 2 billion to almost 8 billion with predictions that we will hit 9 billion by 2020 (see this month’s National Geographic) and our earth can not sustain such growth. We need to make some hard choices and although I might not agree with all of what Mr Turner has to say, at least he is speaking up and anyone who says that population is not a problem is in great denial.

    • ephraiyim

      While your numbers are correct there is no evidence that problems found in some high population countries such as malnourishment can be directly correlated with so called overpopulation. Other factors are more easily correlated such as oppressive and tyrannical governments, poor education, lak of medical facilities within walking distance etc. Factors in countries like India must also be taken into account.
      In India every year there is enough food grown to feed their entire population. Problem is because Hindus worship rats the Indian government has laws that forbid grain storage owners from using methods to eliminate pests. Thus, India loses over half of their annual grain to said pests.
      Blaming overpopulation is a greatly exaggerated oversimplification of complex problems that are different for each country and even locales within a country. Some great multinational plan that takes a minor aspect of those complex issues as it’s focus rather than providing resources and funding for nations to find ways that work for their people is paternalistic.
      Here is a fact. If one would take the entire 6 billion people of the world (aprox) and allow each a 6 ft square area all of them would fit inside the state of Texas. It is true that some areas of the world have populations that because of climate, shortening water supply and other factors are going to be difficult to sustain but that is a local issue that can be resolved in many cases by the local government themselves if the resources that eugenicists like Ted Turner and Bill Gates et al. want used for population control were, instead gifted or loaned to them.
      Most problems are better solved by local governments and people groups rather than multinational organizations who want to have one track solutions.
      Beyond that, while the projections for population growth do increase to 9 billion or so by 2020 what is often left out is that most projections after that predict a leveling off with a gradual decline by the end of the century. It also is usually much better to resolve population growth with financial growth. In nations that have moved from what was once termed third world to 2nd world population begins to decline naturally.
      It is well documented that as people prosper they tend to have less children for a number of reasons. First, with greater finances comes better health care so the fear of loosing ones children is lessened. In many nations this is very important as families are more dependent upon each other. Parents with more children can be better assured that when they are too old to work the children will care for them. As incomes increase and educational opportunities become easier to obtain the concerns for those things dissipate somewhat as well.
      One of the most exciting things happening in this area are micro loans where individual farmers or heads of family are loaned a small sum to purchase things such as foot water pumps so a farmer can irrigate his plot and thus grow enough for his family’s needs while having enough left to sell at a profit. Micro loans are also being used in cities where widows in certain areas of India, who would normally be ostracized because of cultural and religious reasons, can by a sewing machine or start a business canning pickles in order to provide for herself and any children she might have.
      Finally, it is not without great irony that Turner made his enunciations at the climate meeting in Cancun a year or so after the whole climate warming deception began to have a light shown on it. It has always been about population. these people are eugenicists. They believe that certain people have a right to exist (them) and others only exist to serve their needs and desires.
      Queen Elizabeth’s husband said a couple of years ago that if reincarnation is true he would like to come back as a plague in order to wipe out as many human beings as possible because they are a cancer upon the earth. (paraphrase) In any case, these are not nice people, and Oh by the way, these kind of people, elitists, started The National Geographic Society. Be careful not to believe everything someone says just because they put pretty pictures with their stories. Do you own research, read opinions you disagree with purposefully. Truth is found in many counselors.
      FYI Google Georgia Gudestones that’ll give you an idea of the agenda these folks really have.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: